Register now
Register or log in to optimize your usage. Clients need to log in to access audio and texts of articles the moment they are released.

Coca-Cola Takes Riham to Court over Bottle

Bob Okello, Public and Government Relations Manager at Coca Cola Central East and West Africa – Business Unit explained that the differences between the two beverages companies emerged after Riham used a 500ml Riham Cola bottle shape similar to the Coca-Cola Contour Bottle, which is a registered trade mark in Uganda.
The Century Bottling Company Ltd, a subsidiary of the South African based Coca Cola Company, has clarified the ongoing dispute over product imitation by the Harris International, Riham Company.
 
Bob Okello, Public and Government Relations Manager at Coca Cola Central East and West Africa – Business Unit, told Uganda Radio Network in an email correspondence that the dispute was not on the use of the red colour on the Riham Cola brand as Shadi Ahmed, Director of Riham, had earlier indicated.
 
Okello explained that the differences between the two beverages companies emerged after Riham used a 500ml Riham Cola bottle shape similar to the Coca-Cola Contour Bottle, which is a registered trade mark in Uganda.
 
He said this imitation is likely to cause confusion in the minds of consumers or to lead them to think that Riham is associated with Coca-Cola.
 
In reaction to the matter at his office, Ahmed hoped that the issue of product imitation, which is the main thrust of the case, would be addressed amicably, but Coca Cola has since pursued a legal action over trade mark infringement, after what Okello terms failure to  receive agreeable proposals. 
 
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the holder of a Trade Mark in the contour bottle shape.  The demand to Riham is that they immediately cease use of the bottle.
 
Guidelines on Trade Mark prohibit incorporating similar product features as regards to fair business competition. For instance, the dispute relates to distinctive concave waist and design elements on the lower half of the Riham Cola bottle.
 
Julliette Nassuna, Director Intellectual Property Uganda, says that although the Uganda Registration Services Bureau deals with disputes on trademarks, they are yet to receive a complaint, which can be addressed under prescriptions of Intellectual Property Rights.
 
//Cue in: Me I don’t…’’
Cue Out:…the owner’’.//
 
Okello argued that apparent similarities on Riham Cola containers have been copied from creations, reproductions or adoptions of Coca Cola’s containers.
 
Okello notes Riham through their lawyers initially denied any infringement.  But according to Ahmed, Riham lawyers approached Coca Cola lawyers for a meeting during which they indicated that they would propose changes they were willing to make to their product, to make it distinct from Coca-Cola.
 
Okello says the proposal received was not satisfactory thus Coca-Cola filed a legal suit in court.  A further proposal, which was received together with the summons, was for Riham to make changes to the bottle label.
 
The matter is still in court.

coca cola company harris international product imitation trademark ingringement intellectual property rights

Type Report
Freelance author No
Location Kampala Uganda
Accepted on 2013-05-07 05:17:52

Available files

Julliette on trademark disputes 35 downloads

Later

Tuesday 07 May
09:44 Residents Pin Tororo District Land Board on Fake Lease
07:53 URA, SC Victoria Out To Complete League Strongly
07:32 UEDCL Disconnects Pader, Agago And Abim Districts Over Accumulated Bills

Earlier

Tuesday 07 May
05:10 Opposition to Discuss Impartiality of Speaker
04:54 Tax Authority Finally Re-opens Nakivubo Stadium
Monday 06 May
18:36 Works Minister Defends Quality of Chinese Graders

Related stories

24 April 2013
10:00 Cyber Crime Hinders Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
05 June 2013
17:20 CSO's Call for an Extension on Enforcing TRIPS
22 August 2013
07:54 Parliament Passes Industrial Property Bill 2009
13 November 2013
09:10 Coca-Cola Settles Trade Mark Infringement Case with Riham

Comments