It’s another week again to review our stories and dig out the words that are misused, abused and overused. As an editor, I don’t want to spend 30 minutes or even hold onto the story for a day just to give it a good clean up and polish.

What do the words affect and effect have in common? Well perhaps they sound the same but they mean two different things altogether. I must say that any proficient editor would get bent out of shape over a few misused words in a story.

Just a few of the statements picked randomly from the stories filed this week.

• “The group was compromised of five people”, a group is comprised of …
• “Don’t wait for disasters to swing into action” disasters occur they are not live human beings and we don’t expect them to swing into action. …
• “He refuted claims that he was involved in the robbery…” to refute does not mean to deny, but rather to prove that you didn’t do something with evidence. So in the next line I would expect documentary evidence.

I have alluded to the Writing and Editing Committee of the Associated Press Managing Editors Association which prepared a list of common news writing errors. The list has been edited and condensed for this article.

Affect, effect: Generally, affect is the verb; effect is the noun. „The letter did not affect the outcome.
„The letter had significant effect, But effect is also a verb meaning to bring about. Thus: „It is almost impossible to effect change.

Afterward, afterwards: Use afterward. The same rule applies to toward and towards, backward and backwards, and forward and forwards. Use toward, backward and forward.

Allude, elude: Allude means to mention; elude means to escape.

Annual: Do not use „first with it. If it’s the first time, it cannot be annual.
Averse, adverse: Averse means to oppose; adverse means unfavorable.

Compose, comprise: The parts compose the whole; the whole comprises (or contains) the parts.

Cop: It is often a derogatory term for police officer so unless in the headlines, the word cop ought not be used in the main body of the story.

Demolish, destroy: They both mean to do away with completely. Totally or completely destroyed is redundant.
Drown: Do not write someone was drowned unless an assailant held the victims head under water. Just write the victim drowned.

Due to, Owing to, Because of: it is ideal to use the last;
• Wrong: the football match was cancelled due to rain.
• Right: the football match was cancelled because of rain.

Entitled, titled: Entitled means to have a right to do something; titled means to have a title.

Funeral service: this is A redundancy because a funeral is a service so just write “ a funeral was held.

Imply, infer: The speaker implies; the hearer infers.

Kids: kids are offspings of goats just like babies are offspings of human beings. Avoid using it as a synonym for children unless the story dictates a less formal usage.

Lay, lie: Lay is a transitive verb meaning to put or to place; lie is an intransitive verb meaning to be in a reclining position.
• WRONG: The body will lay in state until Wednesday.
• RIGHT: The body will lie in state until Wednesday.
• RIGHT: The prosecutor tried to lay the blame on him.

Less, fewer: If you can separate items in the quantities being compared, use fewer. If not, use less.

Over, more than: Over refers to spatial relationships: The plane flew over the city. More than is used with figures: More than 1,000 fans were in the crowd. So avoid using over 10 people were killed in an accident.

Peddle, pedal: When selling something, you peddle it. Pedal is something you do to a bicycle.

Principle, principal: A guiding rule or basic truth is a principle. The first, dominant or leading thing is principal.

Refute: The word connotes success in argument and must be backed with evidence to prove an argument.

Reluctant, reticent: If someone does not want to act, that person is reluctant. If someone does not want to speak, that person is reticent.

Temperatures: They may get higher or lower, but they do not get warmer or colder.

Quote of the week
“The smarter the journalists are, the better off society is. To a degree, people read the press to inform themselves and the better the teacher, the better the student body”.

Comments and all forms of feedback welcome.

Start date: 19 Sep 2011 | End date: 23 Sep 2011
Location: London, United Kingdom
Language: English
Application deadline: 08 Jul 2011

For more information or to apply, please follow this link:  http://www.trust.org/trustmedia/journalism-training/courses-detail….

 

This five day training course teaches creative approaches to producing TV news stories. Subjects include research, writing for TV, camera work and editing. Lectures are supported by practical exercises and video examples. The class is run by senior Reuters television journalists.

Eligibility:

Applicants must be broadcast journalists and currently working as a  journalist or regular contributor to broadcast media organisations. Applicants must be able to demonstrate a commitment to a career in journalism in their country, must have at least two years’ professional experience and have a good level in spoken and written English. If you have been on a Thomson Reuters Foundation training programme within the last two years you will not be eligible to apply.

Funding:

Thomson Reuters Foundation offers:

Full bursaries for journalists from the developing world/countries in political transition working for organisations with no resources for training. Bursaries would include travel expenses (economy class), accommodation and a modest contribution towards living allowance. This arrangement is subject to variation.
Part-funded bursaries are available for journalists from the developing world/countries in political transition who work for organisations that have limited resources for training, in this instance Thomson Reuters Foundation waives the tuition cost and you will be expected to cover travel and accommodation costs. In exceptional circumstances journalists from the developed world will be considered for part-funded bursaries.
Non-funded – Thomson Reuters Foundation also offers training for journalists from any region from an organisation that has the resources to fully cover the following costs of the programme: tuition fees: £200 per day (£1000 for a 5-day London course), travel and accommodation costs and living expenses. If necessary Thomson Reuters Foundation can provide a list of hotels for participants who require accommodation in London. If you have any questions please email: foundation(at)thomsonreuters.com

Submissions:

  • A biography of up to 250 words outlining your career.
  • Two recent examples of your published work, preferably relevant to the course for which you are applying, with a brief summary in English (if necessary). TV/Radio journalists can send in their scripts and a brief summary.
  • A statement of between 250-500 words describing any experiences you have had in presenting television/radio programmes, reporting, script writing, producing/video-editing. Explain how you hope to benefit from the course for which you are applying.

For more information or to apply, please follow this link:  http://www.trust.org/trustmedia/journalism-training/courses-detail….

 

I Guess reporters have stumbled upon Mr Rebuttal, someone who picks up a phone from one end and blows all his venom refuting whatever was published about him, his company, family wife, et al…the list is endless.

Some walk straight into the Newsroom and demand to know why they are getting bad press? Ihave heard of RDC’s who have walked into Radio stations and held presenters by the collars…the experiences are all well known to us…

But how the reporters and Editors react in such circumastances matters a lot. I am just interested in hearing how you or your Newsroom reacts to rebuttles and to people accusing you of bad press?

Just leave a comment.