Constitutional Court Okays Presidential Age Amendment Top story

1882 Views Kampala, Uganda

In short
Four of the five members of the panel have said that the amendment of article 102 b of the constitution did not contravene the constitution, neither did it contravene parliaments rules of procedure.

The constitutional court has upheld the amendment of the constitution that lifted the cap on the presidential age.

Four of the five members of the panel have said that the amendment of article 102 (b) of the constitution did not contravene the constitution, neither did it contravene parliament's rules of procedure.

The four; Justice Cheborion Barishaki, Elizabeth Musoke, Alphonse Owiny-Dollo and Remmy Kasule announced the decision during a day-long session held at the High Court in Mbale. In the same session, which lasted more than ten hours.

The Deputy Chief Justice Alphonse Owiny-Dollo, the last of the five judges to deliver his judgement observed that framers of the 1995 Constitution never treated article 102 on the qualifications of the president as a fundamental feature of the constitution that required entrenchment. 

Justice Owiny-Dollo added that the amendment which was part of the original draft presented by MP Raphael Magyezi went through the entire process of the consultation and passing a bill into law as outlined in the rules of procedure.

Remmy Kasule, who was the fourth bench member to deliver his judgment, observed that framers of Constitution gave parliament the mandate to amend the Constitution on presidential age limits without the need for a referendum.

He added that lifting of age limit for one who stands to be president or district chairperson constituted the original bill presented before parliament by Igara West MP Raphael Magyezi, for which thorough consultations were undertaken by members of the ruling National Resistance Movement -NRM party and their counterparts in the opposition.

However, like all the other judges, Justice Kasule rejected the amendment that extended the term of office for legislators and local government leaders as null and void. He also rejected the clause of the amendment bill that re-introduced the term limits in the constitution and entrenched it.

Justice Kasule said the rule of the constitutional court is not to legislate laws but interpretation. He said it is right for the court to nullify amendments passed illegally and uphold those amended through correct procedures.
 
//Cue in: "with the above…
Cue out:…of the district."//
 
Noting that there were no clear procedures on how Ugandans can be consulted when the constitution is being amended by parliament, Kasule recommended that such regulations be put in place. Such procedures, he said would in the future help court in determining whether they were followed or not.
 
//Cue in: "I humbly and…
Cue out:…is called for."//
 
Justice Kenneth Kakuru declared the whole amendment process unconstitutional and urged that the entire amendment act should be purged from the constitution.

In his judgement, Justice Owiny Dollo made reference to the ease with which parliament amends the Constitution arguing that the future generations will be furious and extremely harsh in their judgement of the current leadership for bequeathing to them a state that has no respect for constitutionalism.

"Before the constitution has been sufficiently tested, before the ink dried, it has been subjected to as many as five amendments," Justice Owiny-Dollo said and added that often, the reasons given for the amendment of the constitution are evidently personal to Members of Parliament.

 

About the author

Blanshe Musinguzi
Musinguzi Blanshe is a politics-cum-business journalist. He joined Uganda Radio Network in February 2017. Previously, he worked at Daily Monitor and Red Pepper Publications Limited. He is keenly interested in data journalism.