IGG to Re-investigate Mismanagement of Funds in Abim

1553 Views Abim, Uganda

In short
According to Bamugemereire, although his office carried investigations into the same cases, the new findings by the RDC, Samuel Hashaka Mpimbaza compelled them to revisit the 16 project in question.

The Inspectorate of Government is to re-open investigations into several cases of alleged financial mismanagement and shoddy works in Abim District.


The new development follows a visit by the Deputy IGG, George Bamugemereire. Information from the IGG's office indicates that fresh investigations that included on spot checks of different works in the district was conducted by the Resident District Commissioner's office.

According to Bamugemereire, although his office carried out investigations into the same cases, the new findings by the RDC, Samuel Hashaka Mpimbaza compelled them to revisit the 16 project in question.


// Cue in "So, when we visited…
Cue out…year old, cracked"//

According Mpimbaza, more than 500 million shillings was lost in the projects.


Some of the projects include construction of Bartanga market in Otuke sub-county and Makilatin market shed in Abim sub-county; each costing 38 million shillings, pit latrines that were constructed without any holes or sheds in Abim town council, the abattoir and 300 bee hives that have not been accounted for.

Mpimbaza observes that there is syndicate corruption in the district, which has affected the supervision and monitoring of projects.  

// Cue in "Most of the projects…
Cue out…pay themselves"//

However, Bamugemereire says that much as they are interested in reinvestigating issues of fraud in Abim, the community and leaders need to step up monitoring and supervision of projects, which will prevent waste of resources.

// Cue in "Their argument was…


Cue out…already gone"/.


Abim district has been on the spotlight over mismanagement of funds.


In 2017, Abim District Council resolved for the interdiction of senior staff in the district over alleged embezzlement and abuse of office. Part of the money was meant for monitoring and supervision of projects.